Interference and Wave Nature of Light — Hard Practice Quiz
A Physics cheat sheet for Interference and Wave Nature of Light — every key formula with its symbols defined — plus a hard-level practice quiz to test recall.
Formulas & key concepts
Young's Double Slit (Bright Fringes): Angle \(\theta\) for constructive interference (bright fringes) with slit separation \(d\).
Where: \(m = 0, 1, 2, \dots\)
Young's Double Slit (Dark Fringes): Angle \(\theta\) for destructive interference (dark fringes) with slit separation \(d\).
Where: \(m = 0, 1, 2, \dots\)
Single Slit Diffraction (Dark Fringes): Angle \(\theta\) for destructive interference (dark fringes) with slit width \(W\).
Where: \(m = 1, 2, 3, \dots\) (Note: \(m \neq 0\))
Resolving Power (Rayleigh Criterion): Minimum angular separation \(\theta_{min}\) (in radians) to resolve two point sources with aperture diameter \(D\).
Diffraction Grating (Principal Maxima): Angle \(\theta\) for principal maxima with slit separation \(d\).
Where: \(m = 0, 1, 2, \dots\)
Practice quiz
A double-slit experiment with slit separation $d$ produces a first-order bright fringe at angle $\theta_{DS}$. A single-slit experiment with slit width $W$ produces a first-order dark fringe at angle $\theta_{SS}$. If $d = 2W$ and both experiments use the same wavelength of light, what is the ratio $\frac{\sin \theta_{DS}}{\sin \theta_{SS}}$?
- $\frac{1}{2}$
- $1$
- $2$
- $\frac{1}{4}$
Answer: $\frac{1}{2}$
An optical instrument with an aperture of diameter $D$ just resolves two distant point sources emitting light of wavelength $\lambda$. If this light then passes through a double-slit apparatus with slit separation $d$, and the angular position of the first-order bright fringe (relative to the central maximum) is equal to the minimum resolvable angle of the instrument, what is the relationship between $D$ and $d$? Assume small angles.
- $D = 1.22d$
- $d = 1.22D$
- $D = \frac{d}{1.22}$
- $D = d$
Answer: $D = 1.22d$
A diffraction grating produces a second-order principal maximum for light of wavelength $\lambda_1$ at an angle $\theta$. If the same grating is used with a different wavelength $\lambda_2$ to produce a third-order principal maximum at the *same* angle $\theta$, what is the relationship between $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$?
- $\lambda_2 = \frac{2}{3}\lambda_1$
- $\lambda_2 = \frac{3}{2}\lambda_1$
- $\lambda_2 = \frac{1}{2}\lambda_1$
- $\lambda_2 = \frac{1}{3}\lambda_1$
Answer: $\lambda_2 = \frac{2}{3}\lambda_1$
Consider a double-slit experiment, a single-slit diffraction experiment, and an optical instrument's resolving power. Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding the effect of changing parameters?
- Increasing the slit separation $d$ in a double-slit experiment increases the angular separation between bright fringes.
- Decreasing the slit width $W$ in a single-slit experiment decreases the angular width of the central maximum.
- Increasing the wavelength $\lambda$ of light used in a diffraction grating experiment decreases the angular separation between principal maxima.
- Increasing the aperture diameter $D$ of an optical instrument improves its resolving power, meaning it can resolve smaller angular separations.
Answer: Increasing the aperture diameter $D$ of an optical instrument improves its resolving power, meaning it can resolve smaller angular separations.
In a double-slit experiment where each slit has a finite width $W$, the overall interference pattern is modulated by a single-slit diffraction envelope. If the first-order bright fringe of the double-slit interference pattern coincides with the first-order dark fringe of the single-slit diffraction pattern, what is the relationship between the slit separation $d$ and the slit width $W$?
- $d = W$
- $d = 2W$
- $W = 2d$
- $d = \frac{W}{2}$
Answer: $d = W$
An optical instrument with an aperture of diameter $D$ has a minimum resolvable angle $\theta_{min}$. If a single slit of width $W$ is illuminated by light of the same wavelength $\lambda$, and the angular width of its central diffraction maximum is equal to $\theta_{min}$, what is the approximate relationship between $W$ and $D$? Assume small angles.
- $W \approx 1.64D$
- $W \approx 0.61D$
- $W \approx 2.44D$
- $W \approx 0.82D$
Answer: $W \approx 1.64D$
In a double-slit experiment, the second-order bright fringe occurs at an angle $\theta_{DS}$. In a single-slit diffraction experiment, the first-order dark fringe occurs at an angle $\theta_{SS}$. If the slit separation $d$ for the double slit is three times the slit width $W$ for the single slit ($d = 3W$), and both experiments use the same wavelength of light, what is the ratio $\frac{\sin \theta_{DS}}{\sin \theta_{SS}}$?
- $\frac{2}{3}$
- $\frac{3}{2}$
- $6$
- $\frac{1}{6}$
Answer: $\frac{2}{3}$
A double-slit experiment with slit separation $d_{DS}$ produces its first-order dark fringe ($m=0$) at an angle $\theta$. A diffraction grating with slit separation $d_G = 2d_{DS}$ produces its second-order principal maximum ($m=2$) at the same angle $\theta$. If the double-slit experiment uses light of wavelength $\lambda_1$ and the diffraction grating uses light of wavelength $\lambda_2$, what is the ratio $\frac{\lambda_1}{\lambda_2}$?
- $2$
- $\frac{1}{2}$
- $4$
- $\frac{1}{4}$
Answer: $2$
A double-slit experiment is initially performed in air, producing a first-order bright fringe at an angle $\theta_{air}$. The entire apparatus is then immersed in a transparent liquid with a refractive index $n > 1$. What is the new angular position $\theta_{liquid}$ of the first-order bright fringe?
- $\sin \theta_{liquid} = n \sin \theta_{air}$
- $\sin \theta_{liquid} = \frac{1}{n} \sin \theta_{air}$
- $\theta_{liquid} = \theta_{air}$
- $\sin \theta_{liquid} = n^2 \sin \theta_{air}$
Answer: $\sin \theta_{liquid} = \frac{1}{n} \sin \theta_{air}$
An optical instrument with an aperture of diameter $D$ can just resolve two point sources emitting light of wavelength $\lambda_1$, with a minimum angular separation $\theta_{min,1}$. If the sources instead emit light of wavelength $\lambda_2 = 2\lambda_1$, the new minimum resolvable angle is $\theta_{min,2}$. Separately, if a diffraction grating is used to observe the first-order principal maxima for $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$, resulting in angles $\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$ respectively, which of the following statements is TRUE?
- $\theta_{min,2} = 2\theta_{min,1}$ and $\sin \theta_2 = 2\sin \theta_1$
- $\theta_{min,2} = \frac{1}{2}\theta_{min,1}$ and $\sin \theta_2 = 2\sin \theta_1$
- $\theta_{min,2} = 2\theta_{min,1}$ and $\sin \theta_2 = \frac{1}{2}\sin \theta_1$
- $\theta_{min,2} = \theta_{min,1}$ and $\sin \theta_2 = \sin \theta_1$
Answer: $\theta_{min,2} = 2\theta_{min,1}$ and $\sin \theta_2 = 2\sin \theta_1$
Select a subject
Select a subject from the left panel to begin exploring formulas.